|
|
Ato
Hailemariam meets Sudan's Foreign Minister and the UK's
Representative on Sudan
At the weekend,
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Ato Hailemariam Desalegn,
met with the Foreign Minister of the Republic of the Sudan, Mr. Ali
Karti. Mr. Karti was in Addis Ababa to attend a meeting of the AU
Consultative Forum on Sudan. His discussions with Ato Hailemariam
covered both bilateral and regional issues, and both ministers
reiterated their governments’ appreciation on the current level of
bilateral cooperation and mutual understanding. Both, however,
expressed the need to cooperate further in the economic field, to
organize business-to-business council relationships and increase
exchanges of trade. Mr. Karti noted that Ethiopia and the Sudan had
good resources, extensive opportunities, and a real willingness to
work together and further expand their potential over a wide range
of bilateral cooperation. Ato Hailemariam expressed his satisfaction
with the existing excellent relations and the current fruitful
bilateral cooperation. He commended the work of the Joint
Ministerial Commission and the Joint Border Development Commission.
These bilateral bodies meet bi-annually and annually respectively to
review the status of their cooperation and identify further areas of
mutual interest.
Ato Hailemariam
emphasized that since Ethiopia shared a border both with the south
and the north of Sudan, it believed that whatever affects the Sudan
will affect Ethiopia in the same manner. Ethiopia considers the
issue of the Sudan as a priority to which it is giving serious
attention. He stressed that the two parties needed to make progress
on the issue of Abyie which demands an amicable solution. He
reiterated that the CPA remains the only framework to resolving the
problems in accordance with the spirit and letter of the agreement.
Ato Hailemariam also noted that as Sudan was a member of the Arab
League, Ethiopia would like to see it encourage the organization to
further support the TFG and help address the problems posed by Al-Shabaab.
Ethiopia and Sudan are important regional states and could play
significant roles in the consolidation of peace in the sub-region
and strengthen regional integration.
Minister Karti made
it clear that whatever the outcome of the referendums, Sudan would
remain a reliable partner for Ethiopia. He appreciated the role
being played by Ethiopia as a neutral actor over the Sudan issue,
and by the African Union, as a mediator and a facilitator. He said
that the effort by Africans to help the Sudanese parties resolve
their problems is a clear demonstration that Africans are capable of
resolving their problems by themselves. On regional issues, Mr.
Karti reiterated the readiness of the Sudanese government to
contribute in resolving the crises in Somalia, and he commended the
efforts made by Ethiopia to resolve the problems there. Both
Ministers reiterated the need to work to promote peace and stability
in the sub-region. They emphasized the need to further coordinate
their activities in different forums such as IGAD, the Sana'a
Cooperation Forum and the African Union to ensure peace and
stability in the region as well as in Africa itself.
Meanwhile, Ato
Hailemariam also met Mr. Michael Rayder, the UK Senior
Representative for the Sudan on November 6th, exchanging views on
the ongoing developments in the Sudan, the current situation in the
Horn of Africa, and other regional and global issues. Mr. Rayder
appreciated Ethiopia's contributions to peace in the Horn of Africa
and emphasized the importance of cooperation in combating terrorism
in the region. He also noted the commitment of the Ethiopian
government in assisting both parties to break the deadlock on the
Abyei negotiations and on post-referendum arrangements. Ethiopia, he
said, had earned the trust and confidence of both parties to the CPA
to help resolve remaining critical issues amicably, and he expressed
the UK's readiness to closely work with Ethiopia towards the
realization of the CPA. He commended Ethiopia’s efforts to bring the
two parties together to ensure a peaceful January Referendum. Abyie
was becoming increasingly contentious but must be resolved
peacefully on the basis of the CPA and the rulings of the Permanent
Court of Arbitration.
Ato Hailemariam
expressed Ethiopia’s appreciation to the government and the people
of the UK for their continuous support to Ethiopia’s fight against
poverty. He stressed Ethiopia’s commitment to ensure peace in the
Sudan and IGAD's efforts to contribute to the successful completion
of the referendum. He thanked the UK for its interest in the Sudan,
particularly during The UK's Presidency of the UN Security Council.
The Deputy Prime Minister noted that Ethiopia had been careful to
remain balanced on Sudan, and as a result had the trust of both
parties. It would continue to encourage both parties to ensure the
peaceful and successful conduct of the January Referendum in the
interests of the peace and stability in the Sudan and in the sub
region. On Somalia, Minister Hailemariam stressed that the absence
of peace and security not only destabilized the sub-region, but also
had a much wider impact because of the threat of terrorism and
piracy.
******************
top |
|
The AU's Second Consultative Forum meeting on the Sudan
The second meeting of the Sudan Consultative Forum took place on
November 6th at the African Union Commission Headquarters
in Addis Ababa. The meeting was co-chaired by Ambassador Ramtane
Lamamra, the AU Peace and Security Commission chairman, and Mr.
Alain Le Roy, the UN Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping
Operations. Also present was the Chairperson of the AU High-Level
Implementation Panel on Sudan, former South African President, Thabo
Mbeki. Representatives from countries neighboring Sudan, permanent
members and African non-permanent members of the UN Security
Council, of IGAD, the League of Arab States, the Islamic Conference,
the European Union and from Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan
and Sweden also attended the meeting. The Sudan Consultative Forum
was established following a decision of the AU Peace and Security
Council to provide coordinated international support to the ongoing
peace processes in Sudan, its democratic transformation, the
implementation of the remaining provisions of the Comprehensive
Peace Agreement (CPA) and the search for an inclusive agreement to
promote lasting peace, justice and reconciliation in Darfur. Its
first meeting was held in Khartoum in July.
This second meeting heard presentations from the Sudanese Parties as
well as briefings from representatives of the United Nations Mission
in the Sudan (UNMIS), the Joint AU-UN mission in Darfur (UNAMID),
the AU/UN Joint Mediator, and the African High Level Implementation
Panel on the Sudan (AUHIP). Ambassador Berhane Gebre-Christos, the
Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of Ethiopia, the chair of
IGAD, made a statement emphasizing the critical importance of Sudan
to the region, the continent and the international community.
Acknowledging the bold and decisive measures taken by the parties to
implement the CPA, Ambassador Berhane underlined on the importance
of encouraging both parties to resolve all outstanding and critical
issues in the short time available in order to avoid the disastrous
consequences of failure.The meeting noted the critical juncture in
which the Sudan finds itself. It encouraged the Sudanese Parties to
demonstrate the exceptional leadership and commitment required to
resolve the outstanding issues including security, Abyei and border
demarcation. It welcomed the commitment expressed by the Sudanese
Parties to reach an agreement to ensure the successful conclusion of
the implementation process of the CPA, but urged them to maintain
their commitment to respect the outcome of the referendum and ensure
a subsequent peaceful and stable Sudan.
On Darfur, the Forum noted the progress made in peace negotiations
under the auspices of the state of Qatar and the AU-UN Joint
Mediation, in bringing parties to the negotiating table, but
regretted the continued absence of the Justice and Equality Movement
and the Sudan Liberation Movement from the peace talks. It urged
these parties to participate immediately and without conditions in
the Doha Talks. The meeting agreed the Doha outcome should be the
point of departure for the initial meeting of the Darfur Political
Process. The meeting called upon the Government of the Sudan to
create conducive environment for the political process in Darfur,
and upon all the Darfur communities, stakeholders, parties and armed
movements to participate in the inclusive negotiations.
*****************
top |
|
The transitional tasks
still need a lot of work
The transitional period of the TFG, due to end in August 2011, has
only just nine months to go. There is a lot to be accomplished in
these remaining months and completion is going to be an uphill
struggle. Among the major elements that need to be dealt with in
this limited time are finalizing the draft constitution and
preparing the laws for the setting up of parties and for elections.
There is a very obvious need for concerted and coordinated moves by
all concerned and in particular by the TFG which will have to get
its act together and move forward urgently. The most immediate task
now is of course the announcement of the new cabinet line-up which
then has to be endorsed by the Transitional Federal Parliament. This
is the first stage to enable the TFG move forward to accomplish
these transitional tasks.
In the meantime, the TFG has expressed its appreciation for the work
achieved by the Puntland administration in its struggle against the
extremist groups, led by Sheikh 'Atom' which were hiding in the
Galgala mountains. Puntland security has succeeded in removing the
threat posed by this terrorist group, at
least for the time being. It was in early August that Puntland
troops first launched a massive military offensive in the Galgala
area roughly 60km southwest of Bosasso, Puntland's port city. The
Puntland authorities have now declared that they have seized all of
the militants' training camps and strongholds in the Galgala, and
according to President Farole Atom's fighters have now fled the
Galgala area.
This is a welcome development but the accusations and
counter-accusations that are being made between Puntland and
Somaliland on the issue of the Galgala terrorists are less welcome
and certainly unnecessary as are any references to the issue of Sool
and Sanaag, the regions disputed between Somaliland and Puntland.
Although Puntland has pointed a finger at the role of Somaliland,
Somaliland has made it very clear that it will strongly oppose any
terrorists including the Galgala group. Mr. Abdullahi Geljire, the
Information Minister of Somaliland, has spoken very clearly on the
Galgala conflict: "We consider Atom to be a terrorist and we will
hunt him down if he sets foot inside Somaliland." Earlier, Puntland
and Somaliland had begun to co-operate on security issues, and since
Al-Shabaab has made it clear it regards itself as the enemy of both
administrations, they should redouble their efforts to coordinate
their activities further in this regard. Following its recent
serious setback in Mogadishu at the hands of the TFG and AMISOM, Al-Shabaab
appears to be looking for an easy victory somewhere else. Somaliland
and Puntland are relatively easy targets, and there is an obvious
need for strong cooperation and coordination between the two
administrations against their common enemy as well the need to find
a satisfactory mechanism to sort out their differences amicably.
In another development, the newly elected President of Somaliland,
Ahmed Mahmoud Silanyo, is expected to arrive in Addis Ababa on
November 18th. During his visit the new leader will be meeting with
senior Ethiopian government officials and will hold extensive
discussions on bilateral and regional issues of common concern.
Following his defeat in the recent elections in Somaliland, Dahir
Riyale Kahin handed over power to the newly elected government in an
impressively orderly and smooth transition. The international
community now appears to be showing more interest in supporting
these recent and positive developments in Somaliland.
*****************
top |
|
UNDP:
Ethiopia among the “Top Movers” in Human Development
Ethiopia’s recent
and impressive economic and social development has won international
recognition. In recognition of the efforts of the people and
government, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has put
Ethiopia among the world’s “top movers” in its Human Development
Index (HDI). In its 2010 report, “The Real Wealth of Nations:
Pathways to Human Development”, the UNDP has ranked Ethiopia 11th
globally in terms of “improvements in HDI” over the last four
decades. Only Oman, China, Nepal, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Laos PDR,
Tunisia, South Korea, Algeria and Morocco fared better than
Ethiopia. Ethiopia tops the list of sub-Saharan countries that have
made progress in HDI improvements. In fact, only three other
sub-Saharan states, Botswana (14th), Benin (18th),
and Burkina Faso (25th), are in the top 25 positions of
the list of 135 countries. The Report attributes the significant
gains these countries have made in their respective HDI scales to a
marked expansion of education and health care services. Ethiopia’s
performance in the “non-income HDI”, an index that excludes economic
performance, is actually even more impressive, being ranked at 8th!
The report defines
HDI as a “composite measure of achievement in three basic dimensions
of human development, a long and healthy life, access to knowledge,
and a decent standard of living.” By any measure, this demonstrates
tremendous achievement by Ethiopia, but the facts do need to be
viewed in the right context. The forty-year time frame, from 1970 to
2010, coincides with two sharply contrasting periods in recent
Ethiopian history: the period of regression characterized by
instability, war and displacement during the military regime between
1974 and 1991, as well as the subsequent period of peace, hope and
development from 1991 to the present. So a forty-year retrospective
measurement of Ethiopia’s HDI progress actually conceals the
improvements the country has demonstrated in the last twenty years,
and even more in the last decade when development has taken off.
This success story might come as a surprise to external observers,
but not to our partners and to genuine independent analysts. At no
time in its previous history has Ethiopia placed development at the
center of its agenda, nor had a government fully committed to
economic progress and social development.
The report is
significant for Ethiopia in more ways than one. First, such an
achievement reaffirms the appropriateness of our policies and
strategies. It gives us the confidence that we are indeed on the
right development path. Second, it provides predictions for a better
performance in the future, and can re-energize us to do more with
less. Thirdly, such a recognition instills the “can do” spirit in a
society which has for millennia considered poverty and
underdevelopment the work of God, not government. If we can move
this fast with our meager resources, how much better will we be able
to do with even more generous financial and material support from
our development partners? The eradication of the great enemies –
poverty, illiteracy and disease - within the time frame of the
Millennium Development Goals cannot be impossible.
The UNDP Report also
highlighted the ebb and flow of the search for representative
measures of human development. The main thrust in the search for a
better and more comprehensive alternative to the traditional Gross
National Product (GNP) came about twenty years ago when the first
HDI was published. While GNP measures performance solely on the
basis of income, the HDI embraces other factors, including education
and life expectancy. Since then, income, education and public
health indicators have become the most important determinants of the
HDI, and recognition of “the huge breadth” of human development
underlines the need to measure a country’s performance along a
diverse set of criteria.
While factoring these elements into the index was once considered an
innovation, the quest for a better approach to reflect progress in
human development has remained undiminished. When celebrating the 20th
anniversary of the first publication of the HDI, UNDP has come up
with a new perspective to human development. The 2010 Report has
included some other “experimental” measures of equity: the
Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index, the Gender Inequality
Index and the Multi-dimensional Poverty Index. These all amount to a
stark message to public policy makers across the globe that no
country can lay claim to being ‘developed’ without bridging the
chasm between the haves and have-nots or the perpetual disparity
between men and women. Moreover, additional measures are in the
pipeline. In the report's introductory remarks, Helen Clarke, UNDP
Executive Director, has hinted at the prospect of incorporating into
the HDI some even “more difficult issues, including the increasingly
critical area of sustainability, as well as inequality and broader
notions of empowerment.” These will certainly provide for an even
more complete analysis of development. On the basis of past efforts,
and on the new Growth and Transformation Plan, we are confident that
Ethiopia is moving on a path which will enable it to continue its
place in any such measures of development and progress.
*****************
top |
|
Core
Principles of Ethiopia’s foreign Policy: Ethiopia-Kuwait relations
Formal diplomatic
relations only started between Ethiopia and Kuwait in 1967, but the
people of both nations have known each other for many years.
Historical and cultural relations between the two served as a spring
board for relations to improve at various times. Indeed, both
countries share the same traditional and cultural values that still
prevail in both Ethiopia and Kuwait. Respective embassies, in fact,
were only opened in 1997, underlining the fact that the blossoming
of relations only came after the downfall of the military regime of
the Derg, and after the EPRDF's coming to power. A series of high
level visits, by Prime Minister Meles, Foreign Minister Seyoum and
other officials from Ethiopia, and by Sheikh Nasser, Prime Minister
of the State of Kuwait, by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign
Minister,Sheikh Mohamed, and others from Kuwait, have taken place at
various times. Among other things, the exchange of visits has
resulted in signing of a number of different agreements and the
establishment of a Joint Ministerial Commission to provide for a
follow-up mechanism, for implementation of agreements.
Economic relations
between the two sisterly countries have been gaining momentum
recently. Ethiopia and Kuwait have, of course, been trading with
each other long before any trade agreements were signed. Before 1997
the balance of trade was in favor of Ethiopia. These days, however,
the volume of trade amounting to over 41 million birr is in favor of
Kuwait. The amount, however, is not up to the expectations of either
country. There are ample opportunities for very considerable
improvement in business links between Ethiopia and Kuwait, provided
we work together on the principles of comparative advantage for each
others’ benefit. The products of both countries are not competitive
but rather supplement each other; and our proximity should be
another factor encouraging improved trade relations.
The Kuwaiti
Government has put in place mechanisms to encourage for Kuwait
nationals to invest in Ethiopia. It is another sign of Kuwait's
goodwill and cooperation with the people and Government of Ethiopia.
Kuwaiti investors have now started to look towards Ethiopia and can
be expected to increase the size and volume of projects in Ethiopia,
but we have to admit that both countries could do more to attract
tourists from Kuwait to Ethiopia.
Another manifestation of the State of Kuwait's assistance to
Ethiopia's development efforts has been its willingness to provide
jet fuel to Ethiopia on a loan basis. Similarly, Kuwait’s
contribution to the development efforts of Ethiopia, in
infrastructural development, electrification of rural areas and
other projects, is a clear sign of Kuwait's benevolence towards the
people and Government of Ethiopia. It is also an assurance of the
acceptance of the values of a partnership based on mutual benefit
and respect. Today, there are thousands of Ethiopians who live and
work in Kuwait, and Kuwait has played an exemplary role in signing a
Labor Agreement to protect the rights of Ethiopians living and
working in Kuwait. This is certainly another manifestation of
sincere friendship based on equality and brotherhood. Ethiopia
values this very highly. It is, indeed, committed to bolstering such
attitudes both with Kuwait and with others in the region and
elsewhere.
*****************
top |
|