|
|
Ethio-Kenya Joint Ministerial Commission finally convenes again
The 33rd Ethiopia Kenya Joint Ministerial Commission (JMC)
meeting was held in Addis Ababa, on June 2nd this week.
It was preceded by a meeting of senior officials on May 30th
and 31st. Since it was seven years since the last JMC,
the meeting began by reviewing the status of bilateral cooperation
and considering new areas to enhance cooperation. Ato Hailemariam
Desalegn, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs led
the Ethiopia delegation which included six ministers and other
senior officials. Professor George Saitoti, Kenya’s Minister for
Internal Security and Provincial Administration and Acting Minister
for Foreign Affairs led the Kenyan delegation which included eight
ministers and other senior officials. The two heads of delegation
co-chaired the working session.
In his opening
remarks, Ato Hailemariam Desalegn, welcomed the Kenyan delegation to
Addis Ababa and expressed hope that the meeting would revitalize
their long-standing bilateral relationship and enhance the historic
contacts existing between the two countries. He noted that the
Ethiopia Kenya Joint Ministerial Commission created excellent
opportunities to cement the links between the two countries. He also
observed that despite the seven years gap since the last meeting,
ties between Kenya and Ethiopia had continued to flourish.
He cited
the example of the successful joint efforts within the CEWARN
mechanism to address the problems of pastoral communities in the
Somali and Karamoja clusters along the border areas. He expressed
his confidence that the recent meeting of the Joint Border
Administrators and Commissioners held in Nairobi had successfully
addressed the recent insecurity along the common border.
Ato Hailemariam
reiterated that Ethiopia and Kenya were tied together by a long
border, shared trans-boundary resources and challenges, as well as
by ethnic groups that straddled the common boundary. He noted that
both countries have taken steps to strengthen their ties. He praised
the leaders of both countries for using every opportunity to deepen
relations for the mutual benefits of the two peoples. He also
noted, with reference to Sudan and Somalia, that Kenya and Ethiopia
had successfully worked together within the IGAD framework to bring
progress and stability. They had also worked together within IGAD to
tackle terrorism and piracy. Equally, there was room for further
collaboration to deal with other challenges through IGAD and through
the East African Community.
Ato Hailemariam
expressed the hope that the JMC would become a functional mechanism
to unlock the untapped potential in economic development,
specifically in issues of infrastructure, microwave links, power
interconnections and road construction. He appreciated the suggested
areas for concrete cooperation that had been proposed by the Senior
Officials in their meeting earlier in the week. He emphasized
Ethiopia’s commitment to increased and long-lasting cooperation with
Kenya and reiterated that no effort would be spared to raise the
relationship to a higher level as the basis for greater integration.
On his part Professor George Saitoti expressed Kenya’s appreciation
for the special relationship that existed between the two countries.
He noted this was underpinned by special bonds of friendship based
on historical, cultural and political factors as well as shared
values, including the pursuit for peace, respect for national
sovereignty and territorial integrity, non interference in internal
affairs of other countries, the rule of law and the search for a
just and international democratic system. He also underlined that
despite the seven year hiatus in JMC meetings the relationship
between the two countries had continued to grow. The minister noted
that this 33rd Session offered a special opportunity to
reflect on the bilateral relations, consolidate areas of
cooperation, and identify new areas to strengthen that cooperation.
He underscored the need to focus attention on issues relating to
regional peace and security, on strategies to entrench bilateral
trade links, and on developing a joint infrastructure that would
open up links between the two countries and their peoples as well as
on working out joint policies for the sustainable use and management
of shared resources, particularly water, wildlife and the
environment.
The Minister underlined Kenya’s commitment to work closely with
Ethiopia in implementing joint measures to deal with trans-boundary
resources. He noted this was particularly critical in the light of
the fragile ecological zone shared by both our peoples and the
persistent challenges relating to competition for limited resources.
He emphasized the urgency in implementing the outcome of the Joint
Border Committee meeting held in Nairobi on May 27th to
boost cross border security. He drew attention to the range of
proposals and recommendations made by the joint Senior Officials and
urged the rest of the colleagues to offer political guidance on
their full implementation. Minister Saitoti reaffirmed Kenya’s
determination to work closely with Ethiopia towards the full
implementation of the Nile Basin Cooperative Framework agreement (CFA)
and the strengthening of partnership in the search for durable peace
in Somalia and encourage coherence and harmony within the TFIs
there. He expressed his serious concern over the deteriorating
situation in Sudan and noted that as joint guarantors of the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement, Kenya and Ethiopia needed to reflect
urgently on strategies to bring both parties to negotiation ahead of
South Sudan’s July 9th declaration of independence and
ensure finalisation of post referendum arrangements.
The Minister also emphasized the need to finalize the Bilateral
Trade Agreement and measures for Avoidance of Double Taxation; to
promote and protect investments and to enhance cooperation between
the two Customs Authorities to support renewed efforts to promote
bilateral trade and investment. He underscored the importance of
strengthening bilateral relations in areas such as higher education,
cooperative development, infrastructure, energy, investment,
wildlife and culture. Professor Saitoti also noted the need to
endorse the recommendation to hold bi-annual sessions to review
progress across all areas of cooperation. Such a mechanism would
guarantee that the two sides remained in close touch in all areas of
mutual cooperation.
The co-chairs presented a consensus document reached by both sides
after consideration of a wide range of issues. The Senior Officials
had organized its work around three clusters: Political, Security
and Foreign Affairs; Economic Affairs; and Social Affairs. The main
elements of each were elaborated and action points identified. They
recommended follow-up review sessions by officials from Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of both countries to take place every 6 months.
The Ministers
concurred with the consensus and recommendations on defence and
security matters. The JMC noted the need to reflect the commitment
of both countries to safeguard the lives and property of peoples,
and Ato Hailemariam emphasized that protection of people’s lives and
property was a basic principle of democratic governance. There was
agreement on the elements of the MOU signed by the Joint Border
Commissioners and Administrators meeting earlier, in particular on
the decision to relocate the populations which kept moving to and
fro across the border. Both sides agreed on the need to produce
projects in collaboration with CEWARN that would benefit the
pastoral communities and address some of their challenges as a
matter of urgency.
The
JMC deliberated extensively on energy and shared water resources.
Kenya expressed its
appreciation with the progress made in relation to the agreement on
power interconnectivity and the agreement over purchase of power. It
also discussed in detail the issue of trans-boundary resources and
in particular water as it relates to the Lake Turkana catchment and
Omo basin. They agreed that the basin impacted on both countries
and peoples and required a comprehensive approach. They underscored
the impact of climate change, the need to base policy options on
actual knowledge of conditions in the basin, the need for
information sharing. It was necessary to deal with the matter
expeditiously. Both sides agreed to undertake a comprehensive study
of the basin to provide the basis for full and informed discussion.
Ethiopia stressed the seriousness of the issue and reaffirmed its
commitment to the development of a legal framework as well as to
policies that would transform the basin into a sustainable
development area. Equally, in the words of Ato Hailemariam, the
common agenda needs to be grounded in sound technical analysis to
provide substantive information so both countries can move forward.
He also assured the Kenyans that Ethiopia is taking all necessary
precautions even in advance of any agreement, to ensure that no
significant harm might be caused to Kenya. The people across the
border are, after all, to be considered as being members of the same
family. In his closing statement, Professor Saitoti reiterated his
gratitude for the hospitality the delegation had received and
thanked the Senior Officials for their preparatory work. He extended
an invitation to the Ethiopian side for the 34th session
of the JMC in 2012 in Kenya. Ato Hailemariam Desalegn accepted the
invitation, and expressed his strong belief that fostering a special
relationship between Kenya and Ethiopia was the way towards
successful realization of their deliberations, and urged action to
take further the decisions that had been reached.
The meeting also endorsed various recommendations in different
social sectors, in education, and health. To ensure a follow-up on
its decisions, the JMC endorsed the recommendation to hold a review
session on implementation in six months time at senior foreign
affairs level. The JMC officially adopted the report of the Senior
Officers and following the adoption of the report the ministers
signed three agreements on Cooperation in fields of Trade,
Development of Cooperatives, and Agriculture. A Joint Communiqué was
issued at the conclusion of the meeting, and the delegates
subsequently visited the Gilgel Gibe III Dam on the Omo River.
******************
Top
|
|
The 5th
AU/EU Commissions’ Meeting in Brussels
This week, on
Tuesday and Wednesday, the African Union Commission and the European
Union Commission convened in Brussels for their fifth annual
College-to-College meeting in the context of the Joint AU-EU
Strategic Partnership. The respective delegations were led by EU
Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and AU Commission
Chairperson, Dr. Jean Ping. The main theme of the discussions was on
the consolidation of democracy, including developments in North
Africa, and consolidating growth as the world emerges from the
global economic crisis. A series of thematic sessions allowed for
exchanges of views on a variety of political, social, environmental
and economic issues.
The AU-EU Joint
strategy was adopted at Lisbon in December 2007 when the two parties
agreed to pursue common interests and strategic objectives together
and move beyond the traditional donor-recipient focus to start
cooperating as equal partners in eight specific areas: peace and
security; democratic governance and human rights; trade, regional
integration and infrastructure; the Millennium Development Goals;
energy; climate change; migration, mobility and employment; and
science, information society and space. Last November the 3rd
Africa-EU Summit, in Tripoli, emphasized the link between stronger
economic cooperation and regional integration, and highlighted the
importance of increased private sector engagement, aiming to take
cooperation to new levels. It adopted a “Political Declaration”
renewing commitments towards the strategic aims, notably, economic
development, peace and security and the attainment of the MDGs in
Africa by 2015. A joint Action Plan 2011-2013 was adopted to build
on the strategic themes and on the progress since 2007. The EU is
the biggest trading partner for the African continent and in 2009
36% of the total imports to Africa originated in Europe, and the
European Commission has committed a total of 24.4 billion Euros for
the period 2007 to 2013 in support of the Joint Strategy and its
thematic partnerships. Last year, the Commission disbursed 4.1
billion Euros in Africa .
The AU and EU
Commissioners, together with the Chief Executives of African
Regional Economic Communities (RECs) and others senior officials
discussed concrete ways to enhance cooperation with reference both
to short-term challenges and long-term structural changes including
regional integration and sustainable, inclusive, green growth and
the equitable transformation of the world economy.
In the Joint
Declaration issued at the end of the Meeting, the European and
African Union Commissions agreed to pursue and deepen cooperation in
support of peace, security and democratic governance in Africa, to
further build on their intense and successful political dialogue in
recent months, to promote national reconciliation and economic
recovery in Ivory Coast, and work jointly to foster good-neighbourly
relations between North and South Sudan. They agreed to pursue the
consolidation of the African Governance Architecture and the full
operation of the African Peace and Security Architecture, and
collaborate to address transnational threats such as terrorism, drug
trafficking and maritime piracy, and to strengthen efforts to fight
human trafficking. Supporting broad-based national dialogues and
civil society organizations, they recognized the need for a
comprehensive policy to address legal migration, and the importance
of promoting employment and decent work for all, welcoming the
forthcoming AU Summit on Accelerating Youth Empowerment for
Sustainable Development in Africa. They re-affirmed their strong
commitment to regional and continental integration and advocated an
increased pace for negotiations for Economic Partnership Agreements.
They agreed to bilateral fisheries agreements, to make joint efforts
to promote cooperation on customs matters, and to enhance
collaboration in improving the business climate through the regular
EU-Africa Business Forum, and the implementation of the Programme
for Infrastructure Development in Africa.
The Declaration
recognized the need to keep development in Africa as one of the
priorities of the G20 agenda, and to strengthen cooperation on raw
materials under the Joint Africa-EU Strategy Action Plan 2011-2013.
They agreed on the need for increased integrity and transparency of
commodity derivatives markets, and remained firmly committed to
achieving the MDGs as a matter of priority. Recognizing that access
to energy constitutes a pre-requisite to meet most MDGs and is a
motor for growth, they reaffirmed their commitment to the EU-Africa
Energy Partnership and the Africa-EU Renewable Energy Cooperation
Programme.
The Declaration
supported efforts aimed to finalize a joint Africa-EU declaration on
Climate Change initiated last year, urging parties to increase their
emission reduction targets. Special focus needed to be paid to the
implementation of the Adaptation Framework, the establishment of the
Adaptation Committee and further progress on the work programme on
loss and damage. They welcomed progress on the Green Development
Fund, and saw the Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio next
year as an opportunity to advance commitments to sustainable
development. It agreed on the importance of financing for
agricultural research for development and reaffirmed commitment to
the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) and Africa
initiative. They supported the issue of securing adequate and
predictable resources for the effective implementation of the Joint
Africa-EU Strategy (JAES) and its successive Action Plans. The
Declaration noted that the political and operational impetus
provided by the two Commissions was instrumental for the success of
the Africa-EU Partnership, but the Commissions could not deliver by
themselves. All other stakeholders, Member States, RECs,
Parliaments, private sector, civil society, local authorities and
media were therefore invited to join in their efforts to foster the
implementation of the Action Plan 2011-13 of the Joint Strategy and
to deliver visible results.
*****************
Top
|
|
Further
progress in Mogadishu but political challenges unresolved
This week has seen further heavy fighting in Mogadishu as
government forces allied with AMISOM have continued to advance
around the Bakaraha market area gaining more territory from Al-Shabaab.
Al-Furqan radio station which has been broadcasting Al-Shabaab
propaganda for several years from inside the market was forced to
move out. Al-Furqan has consistently supported Al-Shabaab actions
and praised the activities of its militia in the city. There has
also been heavy fighting in the districts of Hodan, Howlwadaag and
Wardhigley in the central area of the city with heavy casualties on
both sides. More than 30 deaths have been reported and dozens of
injured including militia officers and civilians. Al-Shabaab, which
is suffering from lack of ammunition and increasing defections, is
said to have lost several senior people including two foreign
fighters and Sheik Fu’ad Shongole. Sheikh Fu’ad was apparently
wounded in fighting at African Village in Hodan district when he
tried to recover the dead body of one of the foreign fighters and
reportedly died later. He has, however, been erroneously reported
dead on more than one occasion previously.
Al-Shabaab
has now threatened to launch "coordinated suicide attacks" against
bases of Transitional Federal Government forces and of AMISOM in
Mogadishu. Al-Shabaab spokesman, Sheikh Ali Muhamud Rage “Ali Dheere”,
told Al-Shabaab radio stations in Mogadishu that fighters have been
"mobilized to launch suicide coordinated attacks against government
bases and AU peacekeepers in Mogadishu".
This is described as a change in fighting tactics and Sheikh Ali
Dheere added that Al-Shabaab was going to "step up fighting" and did
not despair of recapturing areas from government forces. Al-Shabaab
has claimed responsibility for yesterday's land mine explosion
against an army base in Mogadishu's Dharkenleey District in which
six soldiers were wounded.
On the political
front, an Islamic Court Party has
been established in Mogadishu after several days of discussions in
Mogadishu. It has a central committee of 21 members with Abukar
Hassan Farah as Chairman of the Party, and Abdirahman Isse Adow as
his Deputy. In another development, the former TFG Minister of
Defence, Sheikh Yusuf Indha-Adde has held a press conference in
Mogadishu and indicated that he will appoint himself as Somali
President if the Somali Parliament
fails to hold a session in Mogadishu before August to elect a new
President. Sheikh Indha-Adde said that he would be very happy if
elections were held, but he insisted that there would be chaos if
the Parliament failed to hold elections for a new Somalia authority.
The International Contact Group on Somalia
met in Kampala yesterday and today. Both President Sheikh Sharif and
Speaker Sherif Hassan are attending the meeting as well as the
President of Puntland. Opening the meeting yesterday, President
Museveni proposed that the mandate of the Transitional Federal
Government should be extended by a year in order to consolidate the
gains made on the ground by AMISOM and TFG forces. This, he said,
would be preferable to acrimonious presidential elections or the
expiry of all the TFIs.
Meanwhile, reports
from Kismayo in the south indicate growing tension in the port city.
A large number of well armed Al-Shabaab militia plus “technicals”
and a group of foreign have left the town moving towards the western
border with Kenya, towards the towns of Dhoblai and Afmadow. Al-Shabaab
has also launched an attack against a
military base belonging to the Ras Kamboni group in Kulbiyow area of
Lower Jubba Region, situated near the border with Kenya. Reports
from there say the two groups clashed after Al-Shabaab fighters
attacked Ras Kamboni bases with both sides using heavy weapons. At
least four fighters died and many others were wounded. There were
unconfirmed reports of civilian casualties.
The locality is now under the control of Al-Shabaab and the
Ras Kamboni fighters are said to have retreated across the Kenyan
border. Tension remains high in the Kulbiyow area as Al-Shabaab
fighters have continued to conduct military movements around the
area. There has also been a series of clashes in other parts of Juba
and Gedo regions involving
government forces, Ahlu Sunna wal Jama'a and Ras Kamboni fighters on
the one side and Al-Shabaab forces on the other.
*****************
Top
|
|
“Poverty will soon be history”: Prime Minister Meles
Millions of
Ethiopians celebrated the 20th anniversary of the fall of
the tyrannical Derg regime with demonstrations and mass rallies
throughout the country. In addition to the anniversary the major
theme of the celebrations was the recently launched Renaissance Dam.
The day was colourfully celebrated in the capital Addis Ababa with
estimates of more than a million people gathered in and around
Meskal Square. Senior government officials, religious leaders, and
members of the diplomatic community were among the dignitaries who
attended the rally which was addressed by Prime Minister Meles.
In his address to
the demonstrators, Prime Minister Meles expressed his own elation at
the enthusiasm and excitement displayed by the peoples of Ethiopia.
He was particularly delighted by the response to the Renaissance
Dam. Speaking of the Dam, the prime Minister underlined its enormous
importance in dispelling the illusions of some people that
Ethiopians would never be able to pull themselves out of poverty or
be able to undertake such a huge project on their own. The
Renaissance Dam was a particularly important milestone because it
showed the world that Ethiopians had finally managed to break
through the veneer of hopelessness that poverty had imposed on them
for centuries. It showed the world that the government and peoples
of Ethiopia were too far sighted to be driven by vengeance or
revenge against those who had for decades campaigned to deny them
any opportunity to take advantage of their own resources. He
emphasized that it was this shrewd discernment that had prompted the
government of Ethiopia to call on the lower riparian states to
cooperate on the project and take advantage of the benefits that the
dam would bring.
The dam also
provided a vivid demonstration for the entire world of the resolve
and dedication of Ethiopians to fight strenuously against poverty
even if it meant having to compromise on the number of meals a day.
Prime Minister Meles stressed that the Renaissance Dam was not just
a huge hydro-electric generating project. Now that Ethiopians have
put in place a democratic system reflecting the diversity of the
peoples of Ethiopia, the dam was to be seen as a monument to the
dedication and commitment of Ethiopians to reclaim the glorious past
of their forbears by eradicating poverty once and for all. The dam,
Prime Minister Meles added, was a monument to the resolve of all
never to sit idly by or allow people to starve when resources could
be used to the advantage of everybody.
The Prime Minister
noted that millions had already contributed their money, their
effort and their time for the cause. The project would be totally
owned, financed and built by Ethiopians. As such, the Dam was a
title deed for all Ethiopians, representing their ownership of the
journey to renaissance of the nation. The Dam, the Prime Minister
added, was quite simply a living monument to the success of the
efforts of the peoples of Ethiopia.
Prime Minister
Meles expressed the readiness of the government and the ruling
party, the Ethiopian Peoples Revolutionary Democratic Front, to
redouble their efforts to complete the building of the Dam earlier
than scheduled and at a cost far less than originally calculated. He
reiterated that the Renaissance Dam was by no means the first or the
last grand project in Ethiopia’s efforts to rid the nation of
poverty. In fact, the real significance of the Dam lay more in its
symbolism as the country would also be embarking on even bigger
projects in the years to come. He emphasized that the attention that
the nation and the government gave to the project would not detract
from the measure of dedication and commitment that were owed to
other development activities currently underway. The Prime Minister
was reassuring: none of these efforts would either be delayed or
scrapped on account of the Renaissance Dam. The future was indeed
bright. Given the kind of commitment that the peoples of Ethiopia
were displaying, the Prime Minister concluded by reassuring his vast
audience that “poverty will soon be history.”
*****************
Top
|
|
Accurate prophecy needs to build on facts and reality
There are still too
many commentators from the west who appear to enjoy getting it wrong
on Ethiopia. Rene Lefort once wrote a book on Ethiopia entitled
“Ethiopia: an Heretical Revolution” but that was thirty years ago. A
week or two ago he appeared to be poised to write about another
revolution in Ethiopia, but this time his supposed new ‘revolution’
is more of a pipedream than the stuff of a bestseller. In a recent
article he wrote of a possible ‘day of rage” likely to erupt in
Ethiopia on May 28th, prophesying a Tunisian-style
revolution to sweep EPRDF out of power. His sources were not
verifiable facts on the ground; Mr. Lefort was counting on the
counted on an apparent Addis Ababa grapevine and make-believe
stories of bankrupt Diaspora politicians in Paris or on US-based
websites.
According to Mr.
Lefort, the ruling Ethiopian Peoples Revolutionary Democratic Front
PRDF was in a panic because it feared a North-African style
revolution was about to take place. His language makes clear his
dependence upon the gossip peddled by rejectionist elements in the
Diaspora. In his opinion piece on a website “Open Democracy”, Mr.
Lefort indulged in an exercise in fortunetelling about a near
certain “day of rage” on May 28. His piece, entitled “Beka: Will
Ethiopia be next?” suggested the ruling party would be swept out of
power. Beka “enough’ was the word used by alleged proponents of such
a policy. Mr. Lefort produced no arguments of his own why he thought
this would be the case, but he swallowed everything the bankrupt
Diaspora politicians in Paris and Washington had to say. He made a
series of assumptions and then uses these as the basis of
incontrovertible evidence that the ‘day of Rage’ would surely
happen, something that he appears to welcome. Mr. Lefort is another
case of a foreigner trying to play the know-it-all expert with a
message for the natives to take to the streets for a cause about
which he himself has little or no understanding.
His arguments for
thinking a ‘day of rage’ was imminent do not arise from any sound
analysis of facts on the ground. He has the curious habit of making
assumptions and then turning them into facts a line or two later.
One of his stranger remarks appears based on a fundamental
misreading of developments. According to Mr. Lefort, part of the
evidence for his thesis lies in the timing of the announcement about
the Renaissance Dam:
“This project suddenly appeared from nowhere, as it is not
mentioned in the recently adopted five-year plan.” Its true
there is no mention of the Dam by name in the Growth and
Transformation Plan, it was kept secret under a code name, but the
figures detailing plans for generating 8 to 10 thousand MW of power
in the next five years were a giveaway. Anyone following the Prime
Minister’s interview with an Arab TV Network, aired in Egypt, might
have realized Ethiopia had significant plans for development along
the Nile. Equally, planning such a major project takes years, and
it’s difficult to see how anyone interested could have missed the
preliminary site survey, feasibility study, impact assessment and
designing process, all necessarily predating the revolutions in
Tunisia and Egypt by some years.
Mr. Lefort also tells us the price caps imposed by the Ethiopian
government last January were meant to avoid a backlash against the
government. He calls this “unprecedented intervention of the state”
in the free market. Strangely, Mr. Lefort also happens to be one of
those critics who are adamant that the government has always
harbored Marxist tendencies.
The irony is that half way into his article, Mr. Lefort himself
seems to have doubts about his own predictions. After several odd
remarks about Tigrean economic oligarchy, fear of ethnic carnage, or
docile Abyssinian psychology, he does however produce one very real
fact which he agrees might militate against an Arab style
revolution: “…. the average Ethiopian is not running into a wall
whenever he tries to move on. The beginning of a middle class has
emerged in the wake of the political and economical elite, because
the economic realm is still relatively open… a fringe of Ethiopians,
among the most educated and the most enterprising, continues to get
glimpses of a way out, an opportunity that it can still grasp, by
jumping onto the economic elevator. In urban areas, this means
joining the circle of businessmen or, if that is not possible, the
ever swelling ranks of civil servants. In rural areas, for those who
can connect to commercial networks, it means joining the new peasant
elite.”
Mr. Lefort, however grudgingly, has got that right. Under conditions
where the youth can see a bright future, where there are very real
possibilities for upward social mobility, it is highly unlikely
there would be an Egypt, Tunisia, or even Libyan style revolution.
May 28th was a week ago and none of the rage Mr. Lefort
wanted to see appeared. A million or more people packed Meskal
Square, and indeed they were expressing their anger, but it wasn’t
directed against the government but against poverty, the main enemy
of the government and of the people of Ethiopia.
*****************
Top
|
|