|
Voting in South Sudan’s referendum
In accordance
with the provisions of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) signed
between the National Congress Party (NCP) and the Sudan's People
Liberation Movement (SPLM), this week the people of South Sudan have been
casting their votes in a referendum on the future of Southern Sudan. The
referendum will give the people of South Sudan the opportunity to vote to
confirm the unity of Sudan, or to separate, leading to the creation of an
independent state in the south. Voting has been going on all this week,
but the final result will only be known early next month, though it is
already clear that at least 60% of the registered voters have voted, one
of the necessary elements to satisfy the requirements for a valid
referendum.
The provisions
for the Referendum were established by the Comprehensive Peace Agreement
of 2005 which brought an end to the civil war in the Sudan.
The legislative framework for the conduct of the Referendum is the
Southern Sudan Referendum Act (SSRA) passed in 2009. In addition to the
voting in the Sudan, it was agreed that out of country registration and
voting for Southern Sudanese citizens would take place in eight different
countries:
Australia,
Canada, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, United Kingdom and United
States as indicated in the Referendum Act, which specified these eight
countries as having dense populations of South Sudanese. In Ethiopia,
Southern Sudanese have been casting their votes in polling centers in
Addis Ababa and in Gambella and Benishangul Gumuz Regional States. The act
also set up the South Sudan Referendum Commission which has clearly
demonstrated its capacity to hold the referendum despite a number of
earlier concerns and some constraints on its operations.
As expected, all polling stations in Sudan were opened in a timely manner
at 8:00 am on Monday, January 9th, and closed at 5:00 pm. As of
Wednesday, the Referendum Commission announced that the polling centers
would stay open another hour, until 6 pm. All reports indicated that the
staff at polling stations proved their capacity and ability, encouraging
and supporting voters to cast their votes as required. All observers,
international and national, agreed that the Commission should be
congratulated for organizing a transparent, professional and democratic
referendum. International observers from the Intergovernmental Authority
on Development (IGAD), the African Union Commission, the European Union,
the United Nations and the Arab League observed the referendum at
different polling centers. Domestic observers from various organizations
and civil society groups, women’s groups and the Sudan Council of Churches
witnessed what has been a largely peaceful process. Observers were quickly
able to identify polling centers that completed their work and processed
all those registered to vote. The first polling center to finish its quota
was the Al-Bouram polling center which had only 23 voters registered; as
international observers witnessed, all the voters successfully cast their
votes. Overall in the South, long lines could be seen at many of the
polling stations.
South Sudan’s President, Salva Kiir Mayardit, also Sudan’s first
vice-president, officially voted to mark the historic commencement of the
long-awaited self-determination
referendum,
arriving at the Dr. John Garang mausoleum polling center just after 8:0 am
(local time), casting his vote twenty minutes later. He was the first
person to register and cast his vote at the center. “This is a historic
and symbolic moment. It marks the official beginning of the right to
self-determination for the people of Southern Sudan,” a smiling President
Kiir told hundreds of journalists moments later. President Kiir,
reiterating his usual call for a peaceful referendum process, urged
registered southerners to turn up in large numbers and willingly exercise
their right to vote. There was widespread anticipation, as expressed by
the SPLM’s Secretary General, Pagan Amum, that the result would
demonstrate that the people of South Sudan were determined to separate
"even if fire rains on them from the sky".
Indeed, it is widely assumed that the result is a foregone conclusion
though the outcome of the vote will only be known after several weeks
because of the logistical problems of collecting all the results. President
Omar al-Bashir has already said he and his government will accept the
outcome of the referendum, whichever way it goes.
In the
run-up to the referendum, the NCP and the SPLM failed to resolve a number
of contentious issues including the question of the future of Abyei
region, oil sharing, border demarcation, currency, and citizenship. It is
important that progress is made on these matters if the referendum process
is to be successful and a peaceful transition achieved at the end of the
interim period in July 2011. Whatever the result, the referendum has the
potential to produce dramatic changes in Sudan, as much in the North as in
the South. If the South chooses secession, two new states will be formed,
and considerable attention will focus on the North as well as the South.
In fact, according to the CPA, both North and South Sudan must draft new
constitutions after the end of the interim period, so whatever the result,
there will be changes in Sudan’s National Assembly.
Maintaining calm in the immediate post-referendum period, especially
during the vote tabulation process, will be essential. The international
community can help by providing independent assessments of the voting
process as quickly as possible. A consensus on the credibility of the
voting process will help the parties to accept the results. Both sides
should refrain from making unnecessarily provocative remarks or premature
claims. International donors should coordinate their activities to ensure
support for any humanitarian needs. The next weeks will be a critical time
of preparation, negotiation, and contingency planning. The neighboring
states and the international community must sustain their high level of
engagement with Sudan and continue to encourage peaceful settlement of any
continuing North-South disputes.
*****************
top
|
Al-Shabaab’s problems over the future of Colonel Hassan
Dahir ‘Aweys’
Sheikh Hassan Dahir ‘Aweys’, head of the now defunct Hizbul Islam,
handed himself and his militia over to Al-Shabaab last month, but,
ironically, the collapse of Hizbul Islam has become a cause of
further disputes within Al-Shabaab's leadership. Indeed, it appears
the main reason for the replacement of Abdi Godane as Emir of Al-Shabaab
by Ibrahim al-Afghani last month was disagreement over the future
role of Colonel Hassan. The disagreement arose when the leadership
considered whether Hassan Dahir Aweys and elements of Hizbul Islam
should continue as an armed faction within Al-Shabaab or whether he
and the group should be completely disarmed and retrained. It might
be recalled that when Hassan Turki officially joined Al-Shabaab in
Lower Juba in 2009 most of his militia refused to follow him, and
Al-Shabaab insisted that any who did must be retrained. As a result
he no longer has any independent militia forces of his own.
As previously indicated in A Week in the Horn, the disputes within
Al-Shabaab’s leadership have largely been between those who want all
elements of the forces of Hassan Dahir ‘Aweys’ to be completely
disbanded and those who still consider him to be a leader with
significant clan support and who should therefore be allowed to
maintain his own militia. The latter group supporting a continued
active role for Hassan Dahir ‘Aweys’ include Sheikh Muktar Robow and
Fuad Shongole, currently in charge of Al-Shabaab activities in Bay
and Bakool, and Puntland respectively. They argue that allowing
Hassan Dahir ‘Aweys’ to keep control of some forces will help him
mobilize a clan militia which could be helpful to Al-Shabaab in
Galgudud region in central Somalia. Reports from ‘Eel Buur in
Galgudud that Al-Shabaab is deploying large numbers of fighters in
the area underlines the possibility that Al-Shabaab is preparing to
support an attempt by Hassan Dahir ‘Aweys’ to try and attack his
home area of Dusa Mareb, now controlled by Ahlu Sunna wal Jama’a,
the ally of the TFG. Elders in ‘Eel Buur have criticized Al-Shabaab’s
arrest of a leading businessman and of some elders in the town in
the last week.
The other group within Al-Shabaab’s leadership includes Abdi Godane,
replaced as Al-Shabaab’s Emir at the shura meeting on December 25th
by Ibrahim al-Afghani who has been an ally of Sheikh Muktar
Robow. Abdi Godane sees Hassan Dahir ‘Aweys’ as a ‘lame duck’, with
no longer any future as a significant political or religious player.
However, the dispute has much wider ramifications. Abdi Godane has
been the main proponent of incorporating foreign elements into Al-Shabaab.
Among those who have been holding senior positions in Al-Shabaab
have been Sheikh Mohamed Abu Faid, a Saudi Arabian, as financial
manager; Abu Musa Mombasa (Pakistani) head of security and training;
and Mahmoud Mujajir, from Sudan, responsible for the recruitment of
suicide bombers.
Sources following developments on the ground closely consider the
disagreement as part of a larger dispute within Al-Shabaab. It
certainly marks a division between the different ideological views
over just how far Al-Shabaab should operate with a nationalistic or
an international agenda, on how closely it should ally with al-Qaeda.
This also relates to the inter-clan relationships of Al-Shabaab
leaders, and to such factors as terrorist attacks outside Somalia or
international relief efforts inside Somalia. Some of Al-Shabaab’s
leadership continue to strongly support the banning of relief
efforts by humanitarian agencies in areas they claim to control;
others insist that the seriousness of the drought in southern areas
means that such agencies should be allowed to return.
*****************
top
|
|
The UN Secretary-General’s latest Report on Somalia
UN Secretary-General Ban ki-Moon produced his latest four monthly
report on Somalia on December 30th 2010, covering the
period from September to the end of the year. He identified security
as the single most critical challenge facing the TFIs and again
calls on the international community to provide urgent support to
the TFG against “foreign fighters and other spoilers”. He urged
member states to cooperate in the implementation of Resolution 1907
imposing sanctions on those who undermine peace efforts. The
Secretary-General noted recent political developments including the
appointment of the new Prime Minister and the Government’s draft
road map for the management of the rest of the transitional period
ending in August 2011. This included the establishment of oversight
and accountability mechanisms for the TFG, an audit of the civil
service, establishment of a committee of respected Somalis to advise
on a post-transitional dispensation as part of the constitutional
process, and the strengthening of security institutions.
On security issues, the Secretary-General noted that Ahlu Sunna wal
Jama’a was still participating in the TFG, and that the TFG relied
on this alliance for control in Hiiraan, Galgudud and Muduug
regions. Overall, he regarded the security situation in southern and
central Somalia as “fragile and unpredictable”. Elsewhere he
welcomed developments in Somaliland and the United States
announcement of a dual track approach involving the strengthening of
ties with Somaliland and Puntland. He noted that the Security
Council had adopted Resolution 1950 (2010) which renewed for another
year the authorization to combat piracy off the coast of Somalia.
Following two good rainy seasons there had been a marked improvement
in Somalia’s humanitarian situation but current drought threatened
this as did the upsurge in conflict from August. There are still
nearly 2 million people in need of assistance, and there are over
400,000 displaced people along the Afgoye corridor. The
Secretary-General saw no improvement in the human rights situation
in central and southern Somalia in this period and he noted a number
of cases of violation of human rights by Al-Shabaab including
extensive forced recruitment of children.
The Secretary-General noted the UN’s continued support for the
efforts to produce a new constitution and to facilitate the process
of consultation on the draft produced in July. These included a
Joint Strategic Planning Workshop and a gender audit of the draft
constitution. He underlined that the UN continued to expand its
“footprint” in Mogadishu with 61 missions conducted by various UN
organizations. UNPOS is in the process of establishing a forward
liaison office in Mogadishu and is expected to set up facilities in
Hargeisa and Garowe in the next few months. Following the review
conducted by the Integrated Task Force in June, benchmarks for a
possible transition from AMISOM to a UN peacekeeping operation have
been revised. They are now: completion of training and equipping of
a cohesive Somali security force capable of stabilizing Mogadishu
initially; stabilization of Mogadishu; successful building of
alliances by the TFG in Mogadishu and surrounding areas; consent of
the major actors in Mogadishu and areas of south and central Somalia
for a UN deployment; attainment of AMISOM’s full strength; and
availability of sufficient troops. The Secretary-General referred to
the AU Peace and Security Council endorsement of a new force
strength of 20,000 for AMISOM, in two phases, of 4,000 more for
Mogadishu initially and another 8,000 to provide for expansion
outside Mogadishu. He noted the Security Council’s adoption of
Resolution 1964 on December 22 which authorized deployment of AMISOM
to September 2011 and requested AMISOM to increase its strength to
12,000. The UN remains unable to reimburse troop-contributing
countries for equipment owing to donor caveats associated with
contributions to the Trust Fund in support of AMISOM. The lack of
predictable and sufficient funding for AMISOM continued to undermine
its operational effectiveness. The Secretary-General itemized
details of the UN activities in strengthening security institutions,
and in developing a national security strategy, and UNPOS actions in
assisting the development of the armed forces, the police and the
justice sector.
The Secretary-General made it clear he remained “deeply concerned
about the impact of the conflict on civilians” and called on “all
parties to ensure their protection [reminding] them of their
responsibility to protect.” He added “I condemn the launching of
attacks by extremists from populated areas and demand an end to
these attacks..…I also call on all parties to respect humanitarian
principles and allow the delivery of assistance to populations most
in need. I call on the donor community to continue their critical
support to the people of Somalia.”
*****************
top |
|
Germany’s Minister for Economic Cooperation and
Development in Ethiopia
A
high level German delegation led by the Federal Minister for
Economic Cooperation and Development, Mr. Dirk Niebel, made an
official visit to Ethiopia from 11th to 14th
January. The 40 strong delegation was largely composed of high level
government officials, parliamentarians and businessmen but also
included a group of journalists. The visit was designed so the
Minister would be able to make a full assessment of the impact of
German economic support for the overall economic, social and
political transformation taking place in Ethiopia. He toured a
number of development projects being implemented in different parts
of the country with German financial assistance. The Minister also
held bilateral discussions on the future of Germany-Ethiopia
cooperation and partnership with Prime Minister Meles as well as the
Speaker of the House of People’s Representatives, Abadula Gemeda,
Finance Minister, Sufian Ahmed and Civil Service Minister, Junedin
Sado. The bilateral meetings dwelt at length on ways and means of
consolidating current Ethio-German relations. While expressing deep
gratitude and appreciation to Germany's development partnership,
which is seen as exemplary, the Ethiopian side called on Germany to
strengthen its development assistance, especially in view of the
tremendous development tasks envisioned in the new Growth and
Transformation Plan (GTP).
During his visit, Minister Niebel visited German supported projects
in Tigray, Dire Dawa and Harar and held discussions with both the
President of the Tigray Regional State and the Mayor of Dire Dawa.
Germany has committed nearly 100 million Euros for development
support over the last three years. Its cooperation in the three
priority areas of engineering capacity building, urban governance
and decentralization, and sustainable land management has been
closely aligned with the government’s priorities. The Engineering
Capacity Building Program is a ten year program launched in 2005 and
has so far involved the expenditure of over 80 million Euros in
matching contributions from the German and Ethiopian governments. It
is aimed at creating new jobs, improving skills, modernizing the
private sector and making Ethiopian products more competitive.
Following his discussions and what he described as successful visits
to project sites, the Minister expressed his own satisfaction and
that of his government over the current state of Ethio-Germany’s
economic partnership. He made it clear there would be further German
commitments to assist Ethiopia’s economic development in the future,
in addition to the sum of 115 million Euros earmarked for Ethiopia
under the 2008-2011 development program.
*****************
top |
|
Diaspora Ethiopian-Somalis visit the Somali region, meet
the Prime Minister
A
group of sixty-five people from the Diaspora, normally residing in
the Middle East, Europe and North America, have been visiting the
Somali Regional State and other parts of the country. They have also
had a meeting with Prime Minister Meles as well as other officials
in the Somali Regional State and elsewhere. Their visit which is
still in progress follows visits by delegations from the Somali
region to North America and other areas. Delegations of Somali
elders have also made visits to the USA, Denmark and Sweden and held
fruitful discussions with the members of the Diaspora. Various
discussion forums have been arranged by federal and regional
officials to inform and introduce the Diaspora to development
activities going on at local and national level and give them first
hand information. These forums have played an important role in
correcting the false information that opposition forces have tried
to disseminate about regional structures and efforts to bring about
balanced growth and enable people to participate in development
activities in their respective regions. Many members of the Diaspora
are far from first-hand sources of information. Many media outlets
appear to be run by opposition forces which make deliberate efforts
to deliver destructive messages. Now the government is making
specific efforts to strengthen the activities of Ethiopian embassies
abroad to provide accurate information on developments in the
country for the Diaspora community.
Indeed, the Federal government has taken a number of initiatives to
involve and encourage the Ethiopian Diaspora in activities in their
regions of origin, also designing ways to enable them to benefit in
the process including regarding foreign citizens of Ethiopian origin
as domestic investors. These policy measures, including Proclamation
No. 270/2002, are worth mentioning. As a result, the Diaspora
community is already contributing in many ways to assist in the
efforts to eradicate poverty and improve living conditions. These
include the transfer of knowledge and technology, material and
financial assistance, investment and other activities.
During their visit the delegation were most impressed by the
developments taking place in the Somali Regional State. As they
wrote to the Prime Minister they deeply appreciated the
infrastructural development activities being undertaken in the
Somali Regional State, including the asphalting of roads, the
extension of electricity supplies, improved communication
facilities, the building of an international airport and the
provision of university education. They were particularly
appreciative of the government’s commitment to alleviation of living
conditions for the people of the Somali region, and in Ethiopia as a
whole. The delegation expressed the strong support of the Diaspora
community for the courageous decision of the federal and regional
governments in concluding agreements with the UWSLF and a faction of
the ONLF to enhance stability in the region. It was the first time
that the government of the Somali Regional State had made a
concerted effort to tap into the potential role of Diaspora
communities. It was welcomed. The delegation noted: "In the past
three weeks, we have witnessed immense development activities in all
the areas we have visited, particularly the zones of Jijiga,
Dhagaxbuur, Godey and Kabridahar. The administration of the Somali
Regional State has embarked on courageous and well-executed security
initiatives that have brought about enormous improvements in terms
of sustainable security in the region and in expediting
federal-and-regional sponsored development ventures.”
The delegation took the opportunity to make some suggestions in
their letter: "We would like to request the Federal Government to
consolidate the implementation of the socio-economic infrastructure
projects and to assign Somali speaking diplomats and staff in
countries where a large number of Ethiopian Somali Diaspora
communities reside such as Minnesota/Minneapolis, San Diego,
Seattle, Jeddah, UAE, Kenya, South Africa, Scandinavia, Australia
and Canada” Other suggestions included the construction of a tarmac
airport at Kabridahar; the extension of airtime for ETV’s Somali
program; a stop to internal bickering among Somali Regional State
officials and an end to the frequent changes of regional president
which would encourage development and sustain existing stability.
In conclusion, the delegation expressed their commitment to
Ethiopian unity and to Ethiopia’s constitution, to participation on
development programs, and their determination to stand against any
group or state trying to undermine development efforts, especially
Eritrea or “its hired mercenaries”. In his meeting with the
delegation, Prime Minister Meles thanked the group for the
initiative they had taken to see the situation for themselves. He
encouraged them to strengthen their cooperation with the Somali
Regional Development Association and to invest in the region either
as a group or individually, to help improve peoples’ livelihood and
make peace sustainable. He emphasized the role that members of the
Diaspora could play to support peace, democracy and development and
eradicate poverty and backwardness. The participation of the
Diaspora was in fact vital for the efforts to put Ethiopia into the
list of middle income countries in the coming two decades.
*****************
top |
|
Responsibility for a healthy market
Last week, Prime Minister Meles and other senior government
officials held a meeting with hundreds of the business community.
The meeting was to discuss implementation of newly launched trade
regulations and to introduce a commodities price index. The
government believes that recent commodity price rises have not been
related to any economic factors, and that there is no economic
explanation for these price increases. It believes the increases
were mainly the result of a lack of transparency in business
activities, unscrupulous speculators, an inefficient regulatory
system and a distorted picture of the free market system held by
some in the business community.
The government, therefore, took the step of introducing regulations
to control the basic consumer products traded across the nation.
These short term measures were in effect taken to curb the
increasing inflation that the nation has been experiencing recently
in the price of food and other basic commodities. The increases have
in effect been the result of man-made activity and have had no
economic justification.
Prosperity and rapid growth have long been the priorities on the
agenda of the government in order to reduce poverty and improve
people’s livelihood. This is why the government has put in place a
whole series of different development plans and strategies aimed at
realizing the country’s desired development goals. Indeed, the
government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to transforming
the economy and achieving its development objectives through
creating an enabling institutional environment. Its reform programs
have been largely aimed at creating a legal, institutional and
conducive policy environment to enhance private sector development
in the economy.
This is why the government has introduced a free market economy over
the last twenty years, releasing the private sector from the
constraints of the previous military regime, and providing
considerable contributions to the country’s development. These
policy measures, augmented by various additional monetary and fiscal
policies, have produced encouraging dividends: the national economy
has, of course, registered double digit growth rates over some seven
years. Equally, registering rapid economic growth doesn’t come about
without challenge. Ethiopia has, of course, been affected by
inflationary pressures. As prices of basic food items and other
commodities have been steadily increasing without any sign of
abatement, consumers have become alarmed. The price rises have been
putting enormous pressure on communities, especially on the poor and
those with fixed or minimal sources of income. Consumers have been
expressing concern over soaring prices; the government has now taken
measures to stabilize prices of basic food items and commodities in
the market.
The government has now taken the necessary steps to fix the prices
of a number of essential commodities to contain inflation. It
believes that the continuation of an unregulated free market will
cause public suffering, and be an obstacle to the achievement of the
new five year national Growth and Transformation Plan, intended to
bring about radical change in improving socio-economic developments
and eradicating poverty. Equally, the government is also aware that
it is neither possible nor desirable to ensure development or
conduct economic diplomacy in an effective manner without the active
participation of the private sector. This does after all represent a
major segment of the economy. In the context of the growing
importance of trade as an engine of economic growth in particular,
the promotion of private sector interests are vital to the promotion
of the national interest. This is why the government held its
consultative meeting with the business community, aiming to create a
common understanding of the problems, and to encourage the
establishment of a healthy trade and free market system.
The government fully recognizes the important role the business
community can play in the country’s development programs. It has
given a lot of consideration to the concerns of the private sector
in its various policy measures and during the meetings that have
taken place with higher government officials. Now it is time for the
business community, for importers, wholesalers, distributors and
retailers, to show their sense of duty and their responsibility, to
respond positively to the government’s call, and join hands to
implement a healthy, fair and balanced market system throughout the
country.
*****************
top |
|
Core Principles of Ethiopia's Foreign Policy:
Ethio-Irish relations
Ethiopian-Ireland relations are based on wide ranging issues of
mutual interest. The most visible people-to-people interactions were
during the height of the 1984 famine in which so many Ethiopians
died and which caused the country so many problems. Ireland's
response to that catastrophe still remains a vivid and warming
memory in the hearts of Ethiopians. Most notable among the
humanitarian efforts of the Irish people was, of course, the work of
the Irish rock star, Sir Bob Geldof, whose initiative in organizing
the Band Aid program mobilized the international community to
provide the support that enabled the survival of millions of
Ethiopians affected by the calamity. The passionate and full-hearted
response of the Irish people and their government to that
humanitarian crisis has remained a linchpin underlying current
bilateral cooperation as well as people-to-people relations.
Ireland, indeed, has always offered an impressive example of a
principled position on the provision of development support.
Diplomatically, Ethiopia and Ireland have only a short history,
dating back to 1994 when Ireland opened its Embassy in Addis Ababa,
but relations have been exemplary and excellent. Bilateral relations
have been cemented by the high level visits of Prime Minister Meles
to Ireland in 2002 and of Irish Foreign Minister, Michael Martin, to
Ethiopia last year. Ethiopia's decision to open its Embassy in
Dublin in 2003 was another important milestone in further
strengthening diplomatic relations, as was the earlier Irish
decision to upgrade its diplomatic representation to ambassadorial
level in Addis Ababa.
The Irish government has committed a significant amount of resources
to support the development efforts of Ethiopia, mainly through
grants and aid programs. The major areas of focus include
agriculture and food security, infrastructural development, health,
and education, capacity building and governance. Overall, in terms
of economic cooperation, Irish development cooperation can be
characterized as being effective and pro-poor.
On bilateral trade, the overall statistics show a marked growth
pattern after 2004 with both imports and exports continuing to rise.
The balance is firmly in Ireland’s favor. In 2008, Ethiopia's
exports to Ireland amounted to 4.5 million Birr; imports stood at
140 million Birr worth of goods. There is no doubt that a lot needs
to be done to promote Ethiopia's exports in Ireland in order to try
to narrow this negative trade balance. In terms of investment as
well, much could be done. Ethiopia offers significant investment
opportunities for Irish businesses but there are no more than
fifteen Irish companies involved in Ethiopia and their total
investment only amounts to some 262 million Birr. Ethiopia would be
delighted to see more investment from Ireland.
Ethiopia attaches great importance to its relationship with the
whole of Europe, and to the mutually beneficial cooperation it has
with the countries that make up the European Union. Both for this,
and for bilateral reasons, it would like to strengthen further its
relations with Ireland. Given Ethiopia’s current emphasis on
economic diplomacy and on the new five year Growth and Development
Plan, it will concentrate on expanding economic cooperation with
Ireland in the coming years. The focus will be on encouragement of
Irish Foreign Direct Investment and on the development of trade and
tourism.
*****************
top |
|