To Human Rights Watch
5/27/10
Dear Sir/Madam,
I have been following your
organization's responses to the current situation in
The fact that many so-called “civic and
humanitarian” organizations like yours benefit from the chaos and instability
of poor nations is a public secret. These big name organizations hiding behind
big names pretend to stand for the poor and the voiceless and yet thrive from
it. These organizations have more influence and some times play as the king
maker in poor African countries like
Where have your organization been when
all the pre EPRDF governments were killing and jailing our people? Where were
you when the people of
Now when
Concerning the Election: The necessary ingredients for a democratic election were there:
As the European Observer Mission (EUOM) stated, the election process was calm, high turn out, and peaceful. That means 32 million Ethiopians were able to exercise freely their right and opportunity to choose. The EUOM also praised the National Electoral Board of Ethiopia (NEBE)-the organization entrusted to conduct the election process) for conducting a “competent and professional” election process. This means that the NEBE was fair - able to conduct honest balloting and counting. The competitors were free to assemble, they were able to move freely and safely in all corners or the land, and were free to speak (however vulgar and inciting) on public media and other sources. The private and international media like the Voice of America has given the opposition more media coverage than was given to the Government.
Concerning EUOM’s criticism that NEBE has “failed to gain the confidence of opposition political parties,” is misplaced. Who is at fault here? Could it be that the opposition continued to seek and depend on foreign entities than respecting the hard work and integrity of its own citizens? If the EUOM can see the NEBE as competent and professional, why cannot the opposition? Perhaps it is that they are not willing.
Lack of playing field: Even in
the most advanced western democracies, the parties or individuals ruining for
office do not compete on a playing field. The ones with more money, strong grass
roots level organizational structure, and the ones perceived to have a good
chance of winning (most likely favorites) the election will have more resources
than others will. In this regard, EPRDF’s organizational maturity and
leadership experience as well as its discipline is not comparable, by any
measure, with the ad hock leadership of the opposition (MEDREK). The EPRDF has
utilized effectively its allotted airtime and print Medias. Unlike the EPRDF,
the opposition (especially MEDREK) failed to make use of their allotted airtime
and print media. They wasted valuable time with in internal squabbles and a
trip (pilgrimage) to the
Why EPRDF did win such a landslide? Although the lack of a meaningful alternative (opposition) contributed to the outcome, the fundamental reason to EPRDF’s success is that it (EPRDF) worked hard to provide an avenue for the participation of women, minorities, and disadvantaged groups, who traditionally have had less access to politics and governance, and who happen to be the more than 90% of the Ethiopian population. Respect the Will of these people!
Ermias/TX